Customer Success has a branding issue. We claim to be here to "drive outcomes," "unlock value," and "make customers successful." But when you look closely, what are most Customer Success Managers really doing?
Customer Success has a branding issue.
We claim to be here to "drive outcomes," "unlock value," and "make customers successful." But when you look closely, what are most Customer Success Managers really doing?
They're running around after updates. Logging tickets. Fielding red alerts. Apologizing for misses they didn't make. And way too often, they're getting called about churn when it's already too late.
Let's call it what it is: reactive account management in customer success drag.
Consider the last week your team had.
How much of their time was spent putting out fires versus finding smoke?
Most CSMs find themselves playing support with a new name—only intervening when usage falls off, a renewal is pending, or an exec receives a negative NPS feedback. They're not equipped to look ahead; they're equipped to react.
And here's the uncomfortable reality: You can't win at retention playing defense.
By the time NPS declines or usage crashes, it's too late.
The actual warning signs are more modest, less obvious—and they appear weeks or even months sooner:
But if you lack visibility into these signals, you're not preventing churn—you're quantifying failure.
Here's what a reactive CS model actually costs you:
It's a losing cycle—and it's embedded in the DNA of most CS orgs.
Before you discuss tools or dashboards, ask yourself:
If your team is always responding, you're not running customer success—you're running failure.
So here's the question: Are you managing accounts. or preventing churn?